Auditsu Review

8.6/10

Audit mobile app accessibility, track fixes, and publish a statement from the same compliance workflow.

Review updated May 2026 By The AI Way Editorial Tested 133+ tools across the site 5 min read
Auditsu SaaS Security Web-Based Freemium from $197.00/mo

Our Verdict

Auditsu is worth opening when mobile accessibility has turned into a legal and operational problem, not just a design checklist. Its real strength is that it keeps audit findings, remediation tickets, and the accessibility statement tied together so your evidence trail stays current. But it is a narrow product, which means teams without consumer mobile apps or regulator pressure will likely pay for a lot more process than they actually need.

Try it
Free to start, then pay when the limits stop you. Starts at $197.00 GBP.
open_in_new Try Auditsu
Official Website Snapshot Visit Site ↗

check_circle Pros

  • It keeps audit findings, remediation work, and the accessibility statement inside one compliance workflow.
  • The product is anchored to mobile standards like EN 301 549 Chapter 11 instead of vague accessibility advice.
  • The pricing page is unusually explicit about plan limits, first-month-free access, and the current beta offer.

cancel Cons

  • The workflow is tightly aimed at mobile app compliance, so it is not a broad accessibility platform for every digital surface.
  • At £197 per month after the free first month, it only pays off once accessibility work is recurring enough to justify a dedicated system.
  • Part of the pitch still leans on near-term product direction, so some teams will want to verify how complete the statement workflow feels in practice.

Should you use it?

Best for: Auditing consumer iOS and Android apps for accessibility compliance when your team needs evidence, tracked fixes, and a regulator-facing statement that stays synced with the actual audit state.

Skip it if: Skip this if you only need a one-time accessibility spot check, or if your main problem is website accessibility rather than a mobile app compliance workflow.

Is it worth the price?

Freemium Starts at $197.00 GBP

The first month free lowers the risk of validating the workflow, but the recurring price only makes sense if accessibility is already part of your release process. If you just need occasional audits, a dedicated monthly workflow product will probably be too much overhead.

The Free Tier

The first month is free, but the paid beta plan starts after that and caps usage at up to 5 apps.

Paid Upgrade
£197/month

Guided audit workflow, remediation ticket management, audit trail, and accessibility statement tooling for mobile app compliance.

One thing to know before you start

Read the pricing page together with the Audit Toolkit page. That combination tells you whether you need an ongoing compliance system or just a one-off accessibility review.

What people actually use it for

Prepare a mobile app for European Accessibility Act compliance

This is the most obvious use case because the homepage is built around it. You have an iOS or Android app going out to consumers in the EU, and the problem is no longer “should we care about accessibility?” but “how do we prove what we tested, what failed, what got fixed, and what we are declaring publicly?” Auditsu helps by giving the team a guided audit against EN 301 549, turning failures into tracked work, and keeping the public-facing accessibility statement linked to the real compliance state.

Replace scattered spreadsheets, tickets, and stale statements with one audit trail

A lot of accessibility work breaks down because evidence lives in one place, remediation in another, and the final statement in a static document that drifts out of date. Auditsu is useful when that fragmentation is the actual pain point. The product pages emphasize timestamped evidence, tracked remediation, and statement generation from live audit data, which means the team can stop patching together proof from spreadsheets, PM tickets, and manually edited legal text every time something changes.

Give a product or compliance team a repeatable mobile accessibility workflow

This product makes more sense as a recurring operating system than as a one-off scanner. If your team ships multiple apps, works across repeated release cycles, or expects regular regulator questions, the app limits and same-domain user model on the pricing page point toward ongoing internal use. In that setting, the value is not just finding defects once. It is having a repeatable workflow for audit, prioritisation, evidence retention, and statement upkeep each time the app evolves.

What does Auditsu actually do?

Mobile accessibility work often fails because the hard part is not spotting one issue with VoiceOver or TalkBack. The hard part is proving, over time, what standard you tested against, what failed, who fixed it, and whether your public statement still matches reality after the next release. Auditsu is aimed at that exact mess. The homepage frames the product around the European Accessibility Act and consumer mobile apps, then ties the job to EN 301 549-based auditing, remediation tracking, and regulator-facing evidence. That makes the product feel less like a checker and more like a compliance workflow system for shipping teams.

The strongest product decision is that Auditsu links audit findings to downstream action instead of leaving teams with a report PDF and no operational follow-through. The Audit Toolkit page says failed items become tracked tickets, prioritised by severity and assigned to the team. The statement generator page pushes the same idea further by arguing that accessibility statements should be generated from live audit data rather than copied from templates. Put together, that means one workflow can show where the app fails, what work is in progress, and what the company is publicly declaring right now. That is where the product becomes more valuable than a one-off scan.

The limitation is that this workflow only pays off when accessibility compliance is already a real recurring obligation. The pricing page is transparent, but even a first-month-free beta offer still points to a monthly product meant for ongoing use, with up to five apps and a team model behind it. If you only need a quick website check, or if your app is not exposed to the kind of regulatory pressure Auditsu is built around, the process can feel heavier than the problem. This is best for teams that need repeatable evidence and controlled remediation, not for someone casually testing accessibility once.

What you can do with it

Run guided accessibility audits for iOS and Android apps against EN 301 549 Chapter 11.
Turn failed audit items into tracked remediation tickets for the product team.
Generate and update a mobile accessibility statement from live audit data.
Keep timestamped compliance evidence for regulator-facing audit trails.

Technical details

platform
Web app for mobile app compliance workflows
deployment
Cloud
api_available
No public API shown on captured pages

Top Alternatives to Auditsu

If Auditsu is close but still misses the job, try one of these instead.

Key Questions

Is Auditsu for websites in general, or mainly for mobile apps?
It is mainly built around mobile app compliance. The homepage and product pages repeatedly center iOS and Android audits against EN 301 549 Chapter 11 rather than broad website scanning.
What actually happens after an audit finds accessibility issues?
Failed items do not just sit in a report. Auditsu turns them into tracked remediation tickets so the team can assign, prioritise, and work through them inside the same compliance flow.
Does Auditsu help with the accessibility statement too?
Yes. That is one of the clearest differentiators on the site, because the statement generator is designed to build the statement from real audit data and keep it current as fixes happen.
What does the entry plan cost right now?
The captured pricing page shows a beta plan at £197 per month with the first month free. It also lists up to 5 apps, unlimited same-domain users, and 5 guest seats.